Sunday, October 17, 2010

California takes another Giant Step

Just a few days ago, on Oct. 14, the California Public Utilities Commission introduced Engage 360 to the public.  Engage 360 is a new brand name and a web portal that the CPUC hopes the public will as a place to go for information an to participation in energy-saving activities.

Commissioner Grueneich of the CPUC says "This new name, Energy Savings Assistance Program, is clear and concise. Customers will immediately understand that this is a program that provides energy and cost savings, resulting in a true benefit for customers otherwise unable to take advantage of energy efficiency programs."

According to the new website:  Engage360.com, the program was developed through a year-long process based on an in-depth, collaborative approach between CPUC staff and the utilities. The brand is built on the core attributes of conveying progressive inspiration, meaningful change, and a trusted information source with the aim of galvanizing Californians to adopt more clean energy solutions throughout their lives.

Another part of the new program is called the Energy Savings Assistance Program. The CPUC acknowledged the importance of a single recognizable and trustworthy name for these programs.  The name, Energy Savings Assistance Program, will be used by all CPUC-regulated utilities for programs providing weatherization and energy efficient measures to low income households.

So far, the site is pretty simple with a mainly social feel but since there's quite a bit of government funding behind it, I expect it to move more in to public education on the hows and whys of energy efficiency and conservation.

Check it out and let me (and them) what you think.

Monday, October 11, 2010

Another voice is added

“Convincing millions of Americans to divert their time and resources into upgrading their homes to eliminate energy waste, avoid high utility bills, and help stimulate the economy is one of the great challenges facing energy efficiency programs around the country,” says Merrian Fuller of Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBNL).


LBNL has a research and information dissemination program that has been doing some fantastic research into how to best get homeowners to buy into the deep energy reductions that are necessary for us to control our national energy policy.  Some of their more interesting findings - to me, anyway - are that the words 'audit' and 'retrofit' don't make homeowners weak in the knees like they do me.  They are better sold on comfort, protecting their home's structure and value, or that their entire community is coming together to do this work en masse.  And the best inducement is seeing their local community leaders have it done to their homes and then give voice publicly on how much better their home is.


And since I'm considering going door to door, covering an entire targeted neighborhood, I'm particularly interested in a report on how well that worked out for a few that have already done it.  Haven't got around to reading it yet but will. 


I'd like to see this on the front page of the newspaper, talked about by the morning commute radio personalities, and billboards beside the freeway.  This *must* cover deep reductions in the proper loading order, not just 'let's put solar on the roof'.  Solar companies that are cold calling everyone in town and trying to sell them a solar electric system without talking about what's more cost effective - efficiency improvements first - drive me nuts, and I hope this clarification is part of any and all or the advertising strategies that are getting near (Yah!).

Monday, September 20, 2010

Certifications, Certifications....

Wow, do we got certifications.  It seems like every agency out there wants to have a piece of my bank account.

WARNING - feeling sorry for myself session ahead


Even though I was certified through CalCERTS as a HERS provider last year, it turns out that now I had to take another written test and field test, at my expense, to maintain my certification.

My original certification through the Building Performance Institute as a Building Analyst was fine up to this year but now, for the Home Star Program, I have to get Company Accreditation, also.  For that BPI requires another certification with another costly written and field test and extra insurance riders. Then they want $1,500 on top of that as the Accreditation fee - just for the first year - and without it I can't access most of the Home Star funding or business.

PG&E's Whole House Pilot Program requires a different set of requirements to access that program and, of course, more money.

Build It Green has their own classes, tests, and fees.

There's more but that's a taste of the current confused certification picture in California.  Oh, I forgot, each of the above also requires varying amounts of CEUs (continuing education credits) every year, all costing hundreds or thousands apiece and few fulfilling more than one agency's requirements.

OK, OK, enough complaining.

What I've received for all of the above: one fantastic education in building science.  I often think, "If only I had known this years ago.."  The house as a system was hardly considered until less than 10 years ago and 10 years from now it will be de facto for ALL new construction.  The world needs this if our kids kids are to have a healthy future or for US to all live in healthy houses.

Yes, you've just read paragraphs of complaining about how much it's all costing but the work is there, it's fulfilling work, and a living is still to be made doing it. A lot more fresh faces coming in to this field are required for us to meet, or even approach, two of our local Sonoma County goals:

13,000 existing housing units retrofitted by 2012 (!)
Greenhouse Gas reduction to 25% below our 1990 levels by 2015 (!)

Holy Cow, Batman, we need every SuperHero we can muster.

Friday, June 11, 2010

New products on the market

Just got back last night from PCBC in San Francisco - the Pacific Coast Builders Conference.  Lots of new technology and products on the main floor and plenty of speakers and seminars upstairs.


The State of California had a booth (amazing, eh?) where the Department of Housing & Community Development was tasked with getting out the word about next year's new and considerably more stringent building codes.  The new code system is two tiered in 2011, where - if I got this right - a mandated list of items in many areas such as site development, energy and water efficiency, materials conservation and waste stream, pollution control, indoor air quality and moisture control, and installer qualifications are all part of the prescriptive path.  And a 15% improvement in these areas above today's standards for the performance based path.  That's for the lower tier.  And in 2012 will kick in the higher tier of all the above except a more stringent prescriptive path and a 30% improvement for the performance based.  All good and necessary but/and there will be more inspections and more contractor training required.  So start now and be prepared for January 1, 2011.
http://www.bsc.ca.gov/CALGreen/default.htm for the website and http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/bsc/documents/2010/Draft-2010-CALGreenCode.pdf for the whole thing.  Note that it's still a draft.


Halo now has a line of LED 4" recessed cans that look *great* and they have a retrofit version.  Plenty of light and color temps from 4000K down to 2700K, or daylight to warm.  They'll be a big seller.  And I found out something new that I wish I'd known before: the module for their 6" LED recessed cans can be screwed in to an older existing non ICAT housing (which I'd known) and they make that non ICAT housing airtight, or AT (which I *hadn't* known and which I had after retrofitting so many cans in the last several months to get the AT rating).  FYI, their 4" line is different and can't be retrofitted to a standard can.  They've come down in price to below dimmable fluorescents, though still above standard CFLs.  Definitely competitive and I personally believe are the future that will make CFLs old school.


Eco - specializing in LED lighting - was there.  A newish brand from China, they do a lot of outdoor street and decorative lighting but also have a line of interior screw-in replacements for interior bulbs that are rated fairly good as far as lumen output but some were pretty weird looking.  They also had an extensive line of LED T8 and T12 fluorescent tube replacements that fit in the standard 2 pin on each end fixtures.  Might be good and can they also had some T5s that could be used under cabinet.  Unknown quality and the reps there couldn't answer my questions about longevity & lumen testing.  Innovative and could be good but I want to see 3rd party testing.


There were several spray foam companies there that tout soy oils, recycled content, and no ozone depletion.  Their words are carefully scripted to make them sound all green when they're not, but at least the percentage of non-nasty stuff is growing.  I am NOT against spray foam; I love the stuff, recommend it, and think it's the cat's meow for many problems, but it has a large and nasty upfront environmental cost.


I saw some new synthetic decking products that looked great.  Very realistic, in fact, I could hardly tell they weren't real wood.  Still as expensive as Ipe or high end wood, but though they're not made from post consumer recycled content, the long life span makes them at least worthy of consideration.  I'd love to see a real life cycle analysis and footprint of a synthetic deck product and high end wood like redwood or ipe.  Anyone have numbers on this?


Missing this year, and that WERE there last year, were a couple of water products.  Last year, there were two different companies coming out with plug and play type solar water heater products; basically a water heater/storage tank with an integral pump and control system so all one needed was to plumb to a solar panel on the roof and plug it in.  All electronics, freeze protection, etc. were included in a nice, compact package that would fit in a standard hot water heater closet.  I wonder why they weren't at PCBC this year.  And last year there were 2 different companies offering wonderful graywater storage systems.  Where were they?


Lots more, of course.  Hundreds of vendors and many great products but I focus on efficiency products that can be used in retrofits and that have either a small amount of embedded energy - meaning they're cheap to make and use simple, renewable materials - and/or are cheap to run and use.  All that other stuff used to get me excited but I'm a lot pickier nowadays.



Tuesday, May 18, 2010

Let there be light. And let it be from LEDs.

The following link takes you to one of my favorite blogs.  And this one has a few thought provoking nuggets.  Each one of us can make a difference, however small, that our grandchildren will thank us for.  I want to leave as good a world as I can for them and this blogpost talks about one way.

Let there be light. And let it be from LEDs.

Is Europe ahead of us?

I just returned from a wonderful vacation to France: 4 days in Paris and a week or so in rural southern France, in the Pyrenees.  The French are so French and the buildings aren't considered old unless they were built before the 1400s.  Fascinating history that dates back millenia, though occasionally rather bloody.  And while my lovely wife and I were soaking up the history and culture, I was also taking in how they used energy - how they modernized and heated all the old stone buildings, what their energy package was (electricity production, natural gas for heating, etc.), and their cultural beliefs around indoor comfort, personal space, and expectations.  Luckily, she was tolerant of my constant musings on buildings and energy use.

I expected and was familiar with Europe's smaller, more efficient vehicle size, excellent public transit system, higher percentage of scooter use, and the fact that walking is so much more a part of life than in the States, even in rural areas.  Transportation issues in the cities, and even interurban, are a whole topic in themselves and I won't go in to them here.  But the first thing that struck me as different and unusual inside a building was as soon as we got to our first hotel in Paris.  We tended to stay in what I'll call low-end-fancy or high-end-budget.  Michelin two and three stars but the cheapest of them.  As we walked in to the hall on our floor, it was initially dark but the lights turned on the moment we turned the corner, dim but adequate - aha, they're on motion detectors and turn off after a few minutes.  A little strange for us because the area is dark until you approach it but very effective as far as energy usage.  Then we enter our room and there is no light in the room until one sticks the key card in to a slot on the wall that turns on all the electricity in the room.  This was so common and expected there that they didn't even tell us about it at the front desk.  Granted, I've seen it in a few hotels in the States but it's still relatively rare but I suspect saves a LOT of energy.  No more lighting unoccupied rooms or endlessly droning room heaters.  Then we turn on the lights and find that they're CFLs in the ceiling and LEDs on either side of the bed.  LEDs, no less.  They're investing in LEDs on a public scale.  Small, excellent for reading at night, and probably draw less than 5 watts apiece.  There's more, but you get the picture: our carbon footprint while we were staying there was far less than the average hotel in the States (and yes, I'm making a point out of ignoring the huge carbon cost of our flight there and back - I'm still working on that area).

The other hotel we stayed at was similar, and what came to mind was a difference in cultural expectations.  The quality of life there is comfortable while the average person's energy footprint is considerably less than ours.  Hotels are actively investing in energy reducing technology: central boilers that not only provide the hot water but also feed individual, quiet water-to-air heaters in each room, either fan fed in a dropped ceiling or passive white radiators on the walls; modern LED directed lighting; services that are only available when needed, controlled by motion detectors or key card controllers.  These things cause a small amount of bother.  The room isn't perfectly warm for us when we enter, it's dark until we approach an area, there's more task lighting and less area lighting.  And we're conditioned to expect to not be bothered by little niggly things like that.  But the net savings from those actually very small adjustments are substantial.

Which brings me back to expectations.  I didn't gain anything directly from having to make little adjustments to accommodate these energy saving features.  On the contrary, they cost me slightly according to my American expectations.  But they saved the country substantially as a whole.  This takes me back to my college philosophy class and the concept of The Commons: the area of our cultural life that we all have to share with each other.  Water, air, roads and transportation, public spaces, most things the government does for us.  We take care of The Commons even where it costs us some personally because it's better for all and in the end, that's better for us.  We all do it to some extent.  We pay taxes, we share the road, we recycle and try not to pollute.  In Europe, with it's much older, denser history of human occupation, they just have a bit more developed sense of The Commons than we do here in the States, with our sense of unlimited space and resources.

As our population grows and we strive to keep our standard of living while not destroying our environment, Europe has a few things to teach us about resource usage in our buildings.  And I haven't even gotten to the windmill farms, bullet trains, our plenty big turbo diesel rental car - full size for Europe - that got nearly 50 mpg in hilly, stop and go, and freeway driving while passing stringent air quality requirements and giving us standard amenities that most American cars don't even have as options.

Come on, America, we need to be on the *forefront* of energy efficiency, not lagging farther and farther behind.  Because the country that does more with less will end up leading.  And right now, that's not us.

Now how can I import that turbo diesel we drove there.  Mmmm....